WOMEN ARISE —
PROVE PROJECT (MI)
Contact Information
Caron Jacobson
Executive Director
13100 Averhill
Detroit, MI 48215
Tel: 313.331.1800
Fax: 313.331.8797 |
Organization:
Nonprofit
Start
Date: 2000
Program Area:
Education
Faith |
Program
Description
In 1977, a group of women prisoners in Michigan filed suit in federal
court, claiming that the state failed to provide education and training
for them comparable to that received by men prisoners. This case,
Glover vs. Johnson, 478 F. Supp. 1075 (ED Michigan 1979), wound
its way through numerous appeals and related suits, until U.S. District
Court Judge John Feikens issued a landmark ruling in 1999 in favor
of the women, ordering reform. In 2000, Feikens fined the Michigan
Department of Corrections for noncompliance with that decision and
earlier court orders, awarding punitive damages to the women. After
careful research into community-based programs, Judge Feikens turned
over the resulting fund to Women ARISE. Post-Release Opportunities
for Vocational Education (PROVE) is the groundbreaking program created
by Women ARISE with this fund in the fall of 2000.
Prior to enrollment, PROVE
participants (women who were formerly incarcerated) are assessed
to determine their educational/vocational capabilities. Career choices
have included business, veterinary science, auto mechanics, cosmetology,
nursing, and mental health counseling. To date, PROVE has served
more than one hundred women from Michigan Department of Corrections
facilities. Most women learn about PROVE while they are incarcerated,
either through written information or through a prerelease orientation
discussing Women ARISE and its programming. Upon release, women
become involved with PROVE primarily for educational support. Many
of them had a pre-prison history of attending college and several
had defaulted on student loans, which interfered with their ability
to continue their education once released from prison. Many women
use PROVE to bridge their education financing gap. The program provides
funds to pay for the balance of tuition after grant monies are applied.
PROVE also provides participants with assistance in purchasing books
and, perhaps most important, the program pays on defaulted loans.
In addition to financial support, PROVE also conducts monthly peer
meetings and provides counseling, parenting classes, tutoring, grade
monitoring, educational advice, and application assistance.
Program Goals
The primary goal of PROVE is to provide women who have been released
from Michigan State Prisons with an opportunity for post-release
education and vocational training, including support and guidance
in finding employment, in order to help them reintegrate back into
their communities.
Networking,
Partnering & Collaboration
The
organization has developed a solid nexus with a variety of agencies
and institutions of higher learning, including: Women In Community
Service, Michigan Legal Services , Michigan Department of Corrections,
St. Vincent DePaul, Haven (Domestic Violence Shelter), Detroit Department
of Community Justice, My Sister's Place (Domestic Violence Shelter),
University of Detroit, Wayne State University, Oakland University,
Wayne County Community College, Davenport University, Washtenaw
Community College, Oakland Community College, Henry Ford Community
College, Cornerstone University, Madonna University, Sienna Heights
College, Schoolcraft College, Eastern Michigan University, Virginia
Farrell Beauty School, Women On the Move-College as an Option (The
University of Michigan, Dearborn), TWW and Associates, FAST Track,
Detroit Recording Institute, and Americorps.
Outcomes
Professors from Wayne State University and Indiana University of
Pennsylvania conducted an external evaluation of the PROVE program
in July 2002. These professors, in collaboration with others from
The University of Michigan, collected data to assess the program.
Using a sample size of 20 from a total of 84 PROVE participants,
the researchers concluded that overall, the program has a positive
influence on the women and does assist them in continuing their
educations. However, the researchers acknowledged that the small
sample size prevented them from establishing any causal link between
participation in the program and participant success. They recommended
that the program be reevaluated in future years using a larger sample
size.
Click here for a PDF of
all Employment Sample Programs (220k)
|