Production Notes
A Conversation with the Directors of Prison Lullabies
“What we were looking for with this story was an opportunity
to show the nature of change through process,” says Lina
Matta, co-director of Prison Lullabies. “The four women we
followed face exactly the same struggle, how to cope with addiction,
lack of education and job skills and imprisonment, along with the
added stress of having children. Their ability to cope and their
responses to their circumstances are all very different. Prison
Lullabies attempts to let each of their stories unfold with the
women telling their own stories.”
“In the realm of public policy, many decisions are made
based on political philosophies and the voice of a narrow constituency,” co-director
Odile Isralson continued, addressing the larger issues of rehabilitation
in prison. “Through our process of research and filming,
we have come to believe that more decisions should be made based
on common sense and the reality of day-to-day life. Philosophy
is fine in the classroom, however, when you don’t have job
skills, money, self-confidence or a strong support or family system
in place, philosophy takes a back seat to getting from one day
to the next. The first step is to raise the public’s awareness
and understanding of the basic issues. We need to humanize the
women and their stories. Do we want to continue to lock them up
or do we want them to succeed when they leave prison, contribute
to society, and be a positive influence on the lives of their children?
These are tough questions, and until we are willing to address
them squarely, our prisons will stay full, children will continue
to be lost in the system, and our tax dollars will be doing nothing
but continuing a negative and hopeless trend,” Isralson concluded.
Ms. Isralson said that the idea for Prison Lullabies began to
develop over coffee and the newspaper while in Europe several years
ago. “I read an article about a woman who was in a European
prison, preparing to give birth. I was struck by the stark reality
and emotional contrast of the situation. I hadn’t ever thought
much about women in prison and certainly never thought about what
would happen if a woman was pregnant when she was arrested. It
was a provocative question – what happens to the children
of incarcerated women? I was driven to find out and began researching
American prisons with nursery program,” explained Isralson,
a native of Belgium, who has lived in the United States since 1983.
Her research revealed that only five women’s prisons had
programs set up for women to give birth and keep their infants
while serving their time. One of the prisons, the Taconic Correctional
Facility, is located in the exclusive town of Bedford Hills in
Northern Westchester County, New York. The facility is a medium
security
rehab prison, the largest of its kind in the country. “After
getting clearance to interview the superintendent and some of the
women in the nursery program in Taconic, we decided not to look
any further. The women we met were surprisingly articulate and
enabled us to see beyond our limited preconceptions of what a prison
nursery would be. Simply talking to them was an extraordinary experience.
Our eyes were beginning to open and our opinions were immediately
challenged. We endured the frustrations and eventual victory of
making our way through the endless bureaucracy and tight security
of the prison system and soon moved ourselves into the neighborhood
to begin filming,” Ms. Isralson explained.
“It didn’t take very much time for us to understand
that the nursery program provided an anchor for the women. It was
something that they could hold onto for support, in order to haul
themselves up and out of their old patterns of behavior. Of the
four women we follow throughout the film, all had had children
before,” said Ms. Matta. “The women had lost their
freedom and prison soon caused them to lose their sense of identity.
However, being allowed to keep their babies with them for the first
year of the infant’s life allowed them to identify, take
responsibility, and establish themselves as individuals through
their children. For women who come from abusive backgrounds, who
have only known violence, abandonment, poverty, and addiction,
being given the supervised opportunity to learn to take responsibility,
to love their children, and learn how to care for them, also allowed
them an opportunity to begin to make fundamental changes in their
lives. They began to see beyond the world they came from, making
plans for a future and slowly beginning to believe in the possibility
of building a new life after serving their time.”
As difficult as adjusting to the responsibility of a new baby
is to women who aren’t in prison, it is magnified in the
lives of inmates. Along with everything else they are struggling
with, babies often trigger conflicting emotions. Their dependence
on the women is a constant reminder of the lives that led them
to their cells in the first place – the things they have
done, the people they have hurt, the other children they have lost
and left behind, the devastation and breakdown of their own lives.
The babies are also constant reminders of the seemingly insurmountable
challenges that lay ahead and the enormously high stakes riding
on their recovery, rehabilitation, and eventual freedom.
Yet, within the strict institutional confines of prison, the babies
also bring a special, unfamiliar aura of joy and confidence to
the women. Prison staff and inmates in “general population” show
a different respect for the new mothers. The well-being of the
babies becomes a priority for the women and by association, their
own well-being is something to be considered above all else. While
prison strips away any signs of individuality, the nursery within
the prison offers an opportunity, in many cases for the first time,
to feel for someone other than self, to care and to extend and
receive love unconditionally. The women begin to feel special and
important in the well-being of another’s life, a sentiment
most often alien to them on the outside. Through daily counseling
sessions, interactions with other mother inmates, and most especially,
through the ancient bond of motherhood, their self-esteem takes
baby steps toward becoming healthy, and at least partially realized.
“In an odd turn of perception, we have come to view prison
as a potential for growth and opportunity for these women,” said
Ms. Isralson. “The nursery program proves that as long as
we insist on locking people up, we should also insist on using
that time to help inmates learn from their mistakes, to gain the
fundamental tools to keep them from making the same mistake over
and over again. Statistics bear out this perception. The majority
of inmates who are able to take advantage of any type of rehabilitation
program while serving their time, are more likely than those who
just wait out their sentences to stay free of the prison walls.
The nursery program at Taconic created a set of healthy expectations
for the women along with the tools to meet them. Through the concern
of prison staff and the energy they spend helping the women, a
desire to please and to succeed is fostered and the women suddenly
feel that they not only have something to live for, but that they
have the ability and desire to take control of their lives and
succeed.”
The film, however, only begins within the prison and soon follows
Amy, Monique, Joann, and Anne Marie out into the real world. “We
were extremely curious about what would happen to them once they
were released. It’s all well and good to sit around and talk
about the positive changes you want to make, but actually living
by your words, as we all know, if a very different matter,” recounted
Ms. Matta. “We looked for statistics to base our findings
on, however, there aren’t any strictly limited to women who
have gone through a nursery program during their incarceration.
The only available data is anecdotal, which we were beginning to
suspect was heavily spun in official ‘public relations speak’.”
The realization challenged the filmmakers to make a decision.
Should they limit the film to exploring the program, or should
they step off into the unknown alongside the women and commit to
following them for several years in order to create their own data?
The official period that determines success or failure within the
prison system is two years, so Matta and Isralson make a commitment
to that and set out to learn what the real impact of the nursery
program would be on the four women from four very different walks
of life.
“In order to gain a more comprehensive sense of who the
women were and to put their lives in to context, we visited them
at home or in the halfway house, met their families, and learned
what we could about the world from which they arrived behind the
prison doors at Taconic,” said Matta.
“As time went on the nursery became less the heart of the
narrative and more the door leading into these very personal and
complicated worlds. The prison is just one piece in an intricate
puzzle, that doesn’t always fit, in these women’s lives.
It is a place that at once beckons them to come back, and acts
as a deterrent and harsh reminder of a world that they each want
desperately to leave behind. The outcome shattered our preconceptions.
There is joy; there is sorrow, success, and failure. But those
are our standards. The women, even those who are back in prison,
feel that they have at least made a step. And with one step, they
believe, given the change, that another will follow,” Isralson
concluded.
Prison Lullabies provokes viewers to challenge themselves. There
is no clean ending, just like life. Every day brings a new challenge.
Every challenge brings a new possibility. And in the microcosm
of four lives that allowed the filmmakers in, every possibility
returns with a new challenge and a new hope.
Character profiles of key people in the film
Amy, 28, is a petite blond fireball.
One can imagine her breaking hearts on the cheerleading team in
high school. Always concerned
about her weight and whether or not she is tan enough (the first
thing she does upon release is visit a tanning salon with her mother),
Amy tries to bide her time at Taconic by distancing herself from
the other inmates. Considered a short-term addict, Amy’s
drug use is no less serious; however, she prides herself on the
fact that she hasn’t “squandered her life on the streets.” Yet,
Amy is pregnant with her third child who will be born during the
film. The child’s father, Emmanuel, is Amy’s drug dealer,
crack being her drug of choice. Of her other children, one son
died of SIDS; the other, 12 at the time of filming, is living with
his father.
As her release date nears, Amy’s already shaky confidence
and will begin to crumble. She is wracked with doubt and anxiety
about her ability to succeed on the outside. “I will not
have the walls to protect me,” she confides in a starkly
intimate moment.
Amy returns with baby Carissa to her mother Linda’s home.
Linda has anxiously awaited her daughter’s release. “She
used to be my best friend,” she gushes. “When she gets
home, life will finally return to normal.” In another moment
of shocking simplicity and clarity, Linda reflects on the effect
her own background has had on her troubled daughter. “I’d
never thought of it before, but my grandmother’s husband
beat her, my father beat my mother, and Amy’s father made
many attempts to kill me.” With odds like that and a baby
girl being introduced to the family, the outcome is anything but
what you’d expect.
Anne Marie. In her short 34 years,
Anne Marie has managed to accumulate a rap sheet of staggering
length. Among her crimes: 13 years of prostitution;
fraud; grand larceny, and drugs. Her first two children, taken
away at birth, were born addicted to crack. A daughter is being
cared for by her grandmother. The other child, a son, is adopted.
When Anne Marie talks about her past, it is as if she is talking
about someone else’s hard times. In a shocking revelation
during group counseling, Anne Marie admits that when she had her
second baby she was not only still using, but managed a hit of
crack just before giving birth. That, she says through tears, is
the past. The difference for her now is that she is clean, and
will give birth to her son with the support and guidance of the
nursery program.
Emboldened by sober motherhood after her son, Nicholas is born
healthy and clean, Anne Marie begins to recall her childhood in
rural Massachusetts, a time not entirely lost to her. Although
she has not had contact with her parents for 12 years, Anne Marie
decides to write to them, hoping to find an opening into a new
life with a renewed and perhaps stronger relationship with her
family.
When she is finally released to a halfway house in Queens, Anne
Marie’s mother arrives for a visit. Their strained relationship
clearly etched into her face, they greet each other with tears
and a mixed bag of anger, fear, and hope. Memories of the past
haunt her mother, who is horrified as Anne Marie takes her on a
sightseeing car ride through her old neighborhoods, with stories
to accompany the passing of each street and the famous Chelsea
Hotel.
Anne Marie’s journey is a courageous battle of wills. This
woman who lost everything suddenly finds a stretch of character
and persistence working tenaciously back into her parents’ lives
so that Nicholas will know his grandparents; setting up house with
her still-addicted boyfriend; staying clean, finding work, and
creating a life of family and home for young Nicholas.
Monique. “I can’t bear to be with women twenty-four-seven,” 27-year
old Monique says. After years of hustling, dealing drugs, and
living with abusive boyfriends and relatives, Monique astonishes
us by
admitting that she finds prison comparatively intolerable. On
the streets, she says, people feared and respected her. At Taconic
she is not feared or respected as the system works to break down
her individual spirit. Her aggressive behavior and quick mouth
get her nothing but reprimands from her counselors and warning
tickets from the corrections officers. Even the other women threaten
her with being “written up” if she doesn’t
get with the program. While many inmates wouldn’t care,
Monique knows that she is on dangerous ground. Any more negative
reports
will get her kicked off the nursery floor and back into general
population where she will have no hope of keeping her child.
As months pass, Monique slowly begins to adjust. She relaxes into
the nursery program and begins to open up to the truth of her past,
sharing her stories with the other women whom she grows to appreciate
and care for. Kareem is Monique’s fourth child, but the first
that she has had the opportunity to mother. Her first baby died
of SIDS and the other two are being raised by her sister.
Monique wants to get out of prison and on with her life in the
worst way. She honestly admits that as each woman leaves the facility
she doesn’t feel happy for them. Instead, she feels sorry
for being left behind. When her release date does arrive, Monique
is determined to stay out of prison and tend to work and family. “When
I get out, I want to get a job, I have never worked before. I never
thought I could get high on life. But now, for my son, I am willing
to try.”
Finally, Monique admits that “drugs are a paradise when
you are taking them, but when you are sober you realize what you
have done to yourself, your family and your kids. I want my children
to know me, not of me.”
Joann. “In prison, I have time for myself,” declares 31-year old
Joann. “On the outside, I was stressed out.” Indeed,
with four children, the offspring of four different men, and
the downward spiral of her own alcoholism and life as a drug
dealer,
there was not much time left to consider what she was doing to
herself or her kids.
Her three-year sentence, the longest of the four women, creates
a bitter situation that none of the other women will have to deal
with. While the others will be able to leave prison with their
babies, Joann will have her son (child number five), Carmelo, take
from her on his first birthday. One of the unshakable rules of
the nursery program is that the children may only stay with their
mothers for 12 months, or upon exception, 18 months, if the mother’s
sentence does not extend beyond that time. Carmelo will join his
four half-siblings in upstate New York, where there are being cared
for by Kathy, a friend of Joann’s.
As the day approaches when she will have to relinquish custody
of Carmelo, her mood grows dark and anxious. The other women are
counseled to be aware of the pain that Joann is experiencing and
are asked to give her room while also offering her kindness and
support.
Kathy is prepared for the new addition to the growing family and
aware that the visit of one of Joann’s young daughters may
cause some trauma for the girl. Happy to see her mother and new
brother, Antonia stays close to her mother’s side, though
it is bittersweet to see the subtle shifting roles that they each
play. At one point Joann becomes the child, asking her daughter
if she remembered her birthday and noting that she had her hair
styled especially for her.
The separation proves as wrenching as expected. However, Joann
rises to the occasion. “I can get my GED here. I am taking
parenting classes, attending domestic violence meetings, and alternative
to violence programs. And without Carmelo with me, I can work in
the mess hall so that when I’m released I can get a job at
a restaurant and be a better mother for my kids.” No more
men. Look where they have gotten me. From here on, it is just me
and my kids.”
PRISON LULLABIES Production Staff
Odile Isralson: Producer/Director/Director of Photography --
For 14 years, Odile has been working as a news producer in the
U.S.
bureaus of Swiss (TSR/DRS/TSI) and German (ARD/ZDF) television.
Before that, she was a reporter for BELGA, the Belgian news agency,
and for Canadian Radio Network (NTR). In 1998, she and Lina Matta
set up Brown Hats Productions. Their first documentary was the
short "Running for Bogota" which screened at various
national and international festivals and aired on select PBS
stations.
Lina Matta: Producer/Director/Sound Recordist -- Born in Lebanon,
Lina came to the U.S. in 1984 to pursue a masters degree in Film
Production. After graduating from Boston University, she moved
to Washington, DC where for 13 years she produced news shows for
the Middle East Satellite television market. Lina continues to
freelance for American, European and Middle East television news
outlets. "Prison Lullabies" is her first feature documentary.
Jonathan Oppenheim: Editor -- Jonathan Oppenheim edited the acclaimed
feature documentaries: “Paris Is Burning” (Jennie Livingston),
winner of the Best Documentary award from the New York and Los
Angeles Film Critics Circles, “Children Underground” (Edet
Belzberg), the 2001 Special Jury Award winner at the Sundance Film
Festival and 2002 Oscar nominee for feature documentary, and “Sister
Helen” (Rob Fruchtman and Rebecca Cammisa), winner of the
Sundance 2002 Director’s Award Oppenheim’s many other
credits include: “Hookers, Hustlers, Pimps and their Johns” (Beeban
Kidron) for Channel Four; “Lives in Hazard” (Andy Young,
Susan Todd) for ABC, an exploration of gang life in Los Angeles,
narrated by Edward James Olmos; “A Matter of Trust: Billy
Joel in the USSR” (Míartin Bell) for ABC; “Paving
The Way” (Emma Joan Morris) for PBS; editing on Streetwise
(Martin Bell), a documentary feature which was nominated for an
Oscar, and segments for Bill Moyers’ “What Can We Do
about Violence for Public Television”.
Ann Collins: Story consultant -- Ann Collins has been working
in documentary film for over twelve years. Her editing credits
include the feature documentaries “The Heart of the Matter”, “Belly
Talkers”, “The Charcoal People”, and “Sound
and Fury”, all of which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival
before receiving theatrical and television distribution. “Sound
and Fury” was nominated for an academy award in 2000. She
also edited “Porgy and Bess: An American Voice” (PBS), “True
Life: I’m on the Runway” (MTV), “Martha Stewart’s
Home for the Holidays” (CBS), “Frontline: Merchants
of Cool” as well as several independent dramatic films. She
trained to be an editor under the auspices of Bill Moyers, George
Butler, Ken Burns, Phil Joanu and Michael Apted, and Maysles Films.
She holds a B.F.A. in film and television from NYU.Loren Toolajian: original music -- While composer in residence
at Signature Theater Company in New York Loren Toolajian composed
original music for Burn This, Urban Zulu Mambo, Two Rooms, June
and Jean in Concert, The Sad Lament of Pecos, Bill on the Eve of
Killing His Wife, The Pussycat and the Expert Plumber Who Was a
Man, Walking Off the Roof, The Last of the Thorntons, and he was
the musical director for The American Clock and Curse of the Starving
Class. Mr. Toolajian has also composed music for films including,
Family Secret, Rudy Blue; Sleeping Dogs Lie; The Tavern.

Brown Hats Productions is two people, two brown hats, two
computers, a phone line, some letterhead, some business cards, and
a couple of hundred tapes. The energy, however, is real, the commitment
genuine, and the passion earnest. Tired with news formats that tell
the whole story in three minutes, we wanted a chance to experience
our stories and the people involved in a more personal, informal
and unconstrained way. We wanted our lives to be affected, forever.
The length of time it takes to put a documentary together has allowed
us not only to meet our characters, but also to really get to know
them. We spend time with them at home and on the job. We meet with
their families, and interact with them in a way that could never
possible if we were trying to meet a daily deadline. We are not ignoring
the issues that make headlines. These issues are out starting point,
but, the way individuals react to events, situations and challenges,
the manner by which they try to affect their environment is what
makes our story. Being able to present people as more rounded human
beings and issues as multi-layered stories is Brown Hats Productions.
1264 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Suite 2
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: 202.262.4287
Fax: 801.340.3380
|